Genomic analysis of low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma to identify key drivers and therapeutic vulnerabilities
Dane Cheasley
Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorAbhimanyu Nigam
Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorMagnus Zethoven
Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Bioinformatics Consulting Core, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorSally Hunter
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorDariush Etemadmoghadam
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorTimothy Semple
Molecular Genomics Core, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorPrue Allan
Department of Clinical Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorMark S Carey
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorMarta L Fernandez
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorAmy Dawson
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorMartin Köbel
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorDavid G Huntsman
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorCécile Le Page
Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du Cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorAnne-Marie Mes-Masson
Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du Cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorDiane Provencher
Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du Cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorNeville Hacker
Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorYunkai Gao
Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorDavid Bowtell
Cancer Genetics and Genomics Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorAnna deFazio
Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney and the Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorKylie L Gorringe
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Ian G Campbell
Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Correspondence to: D Cheasley, Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorDane Cheasley
Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorAbhimanyu Nigam
Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorMagnus Zethoven
Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Bioinformatics Consulting Core, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorSally Hunter
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorDariush Etemadmoghadam
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorTimothy Semple
Molecular Genomics Core, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorPrue Allan
Department of Clinical Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorMark S Carey
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorMarta L Fernandez
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorAmy Dawson
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorMartin Köbel
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorDavid G Huntsman
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorCécile Le Page
Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du Cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorAnne-Marie Mes-Masson
Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du Cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorDiane Provencher
Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du Cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorNeville Hacker
Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorYunkai Gao
Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorDavid Bowtell
Cancer Genetics and Genomics Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorAnna deFazio
Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney and the Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorKylie L Gorringe
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Ian G Campbell
Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Correspondence to: D Cheasley, Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorNo conflicts of interest were declared.
Abstract
Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) is associated with a poor response to existing chemotherapy, highlighting the need to perform comprehensive genomic analysis and identify new therapeutic vulnerabilities. The data presented here represent the largest genetic study of LGSOCs to date (n = 71), analysing 127 candidate genes derived from whole exome sequencing cohorts to generate mutation and copy-number variation data. Additionally, immunohistochemistry was performed on our LGSOC cohort assessing oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, TP53, and CDKN2A status. Targeted sequencing identified 47% of cases with mutations in key RAS/RAF pathway genes (KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS), as well as mutations in putative novel driver genes including USP9X (27%), MACF1 (11%), ARID1A (9%), NF2 (4%), DOT1L (6%), and ASH1L (4%). Immunohistochemistry evaluation revealed frequent oestrogen/progesterone receptor positivity (85%), along with CDKN2A protein loss (10%) and CDKN2A protein overexpression (6%), which were linked to shorter disease outcomes. Indeed, 90% of LGSOC samples harboured at least one potentially actionable alteration, which in 19/71 (27%) cases were predictive of clinical benefit from a standard treatment, either in another cancer's indication or in LGSOC specifically. In addition, we validated ubiquitin-specific protease 9X (USP9X), which is a chromosome X-linked substrate-specific deubiquitinase and tumour suppressor, as a relevant therapeutic target for LGSOC. Our comprehensive genomic study highlighted that there is an addiction to a limited number of unique ‘driver’ aberrations that could be translated into improved therapeutic paths. © 2020 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Open Research
Data availability statement
The datasets analysed in the current study are available from the corresponding author, with requests for access subject to review by the COEUR Study Committee.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
path5545-sup-0001-SuppMatMeth.docxWord 2007 document , 54.7 KB | Supplementary materials and methods |
path5545-sup-0002-SuppFiguresS1-S4.docxWord 2007 document , 12.8 MB | Figure S1. Combined genomic and clinicopathological analysis Figure S2. Analysis of loss of heterozygosity and allelic imbalance across chromosome X, including USP9X Figure S3. Bisulphite sequencing of LGSOC tumours within the USP9X promoter region Figure S4. Copy-number analysis of USP9X mutant tumours |
path5545-sup-0003-SuppTablesS1-S7.xlsxExcel 2007 spreadsheet , 235.1 KB | Table S1. Clinical characteristics of the LGSOC cohort Table S2. Inclusion criteria for genes on the targeted LGSOC SureSelect panel Table S3. Sequencing metrics Table S4. Tumour sequencing metrics Table S5. Variants observed and associated cancer signalling pathways Table S6. USP9X immunohistochemistry and expression evaluation on the COEUR tissue microarray Table S7. Significant CN gains and losses across the LGSOC cohort |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- 1Ali RH, Kalloger SE, Santos JL, et al. Stage II to IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary is associated with a poor prognosis: a clinicopathologic study of 32 patients from a population-based tumor registry. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2013; 32: 529–535.
- 2Le Page C, Rahimi K, Kobel M, et al. Characteristics and outcome of the COEUR Canadian validation cohort for ovarian cancer biomarkers. BMC Cancer 2018; 18: 347.
- 3Chen M, Jin Y, Bi Y, et al. A survival analysis comparing women with ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma to those with high-grade histology. Onco Targets Ther 2014; 7: 1891–1899.
- 4Schmeler KM, Sun CC, Bodurka DC, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 108: 510–514.
- 5Hunter SM, Anglesio MS, Ryland GL, et al. Molecular profiling of low grade serous ovarian tumours identifies novel candidate driver genes. Oncotarget 2015; 6: 37663–37677.
- 6Iijima M, Banno K, Okawa R, et al. Genome-wide analysis of gynecologic cancer: The Cancer Genome Atlas in ovarian and endometrial cancer. Oncol Lett 2017; 13: 1063–1070.
- 7Etemadmoghadam D, Azar WJ, Lei Y, et al. EIF1AX and NRAS mutations co-occur and cooperate in low-grade serous ovarian carcinomas. Cancer Res 2017; 77: 4268–4278.
- 8Jones S, Wang T-L, Kurman RJ, et al. Low-grade serous carcinomas of the ovary contain very few point mutations. J Pathol 2012; 226: 413–420.
- 9Emmanuel C, Chiew YE, George J, et al. Genomic classification of serous ovarian cancer with adjacent borderline differentiates RAS pathway and TP53-mutant tumors and identifies NRAS as an oncogenic driver. Clin Cancer Res 2014; 20: 6618–6630.
- 10Le Page C, Köbel M, de Ladurantaye M, et al. Specimen quality evaluation in Canadian biobanks participating in the COEUR repository. Biopreserv Biobank 2013; 11: 83–93.
- 11Van der Auwera GA, Carneiro MO, Hartl C, et al. From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices pipeline. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2013; 43: 11.10.1–11.10.33.
- 12Rimmer A, Phan H, Mathieson I, et al. Integrating mapping-, assembly- and haplotype-based approaches for calling variants in clinical sequencing applications. Nat Genet 2014; 46: 912–918.
- 13Koboldt DC, Zhang Q, Larson DE, et al. VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res 2012; 22: 568–576.
- 14Scheinin I, Sie D, Bengtsson H, et al. DNA copy number analysis of fresh and formalin-fixed specimens by shallow whole-genome sequencing with identification and exclusion of problematic regions in the genome assembly. Genome Res 2014; 24: 2022–2032.
- 15Li N, Rowley SM, Thompson ER, et al. Evaluating the breast cancer predisposition role of rare variants in genes associated with low-penetrance breast cancer risk SNPs. Breast Cancer Res 2018; 20: 3.
- 16Rowley SM, Mascarenhas L, Devereux L, et al. Population-based genetic testing of asymptomatic women for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility. Genet Med 2019; 21: 913–922.
- 17Kuilman T, Velds A, Kemper K, et al. CopywriteR: DNA copy number detection from off-target sequence data. Genome Biol 2015; 16: 49.
- 18 Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature 2011; 474: 609–615.
- 19Emmanuel C, Gava N, Kennedy C, et al. Comparison of expression profiles in ovarian epithelium in vivo and ovarian cancer identifies novel candidate genes involved in disease pathogenesis. PLoS One 2011; 6: e17617.
- 20Gershenson DM, Bodurka DC, Lu KH, et al. Impact of age and primary disease site on outcome in women with low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum: results of a large single-institution registry of a rare tumor. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33: 2675–2682.
- 21Nakamura K, Nakayama K, Ishibashi T, et al. KRAS/BRAF analysis in ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma having synchronous all pathological precursor regions. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17: 625.
- 22Rambau PF, Vierkant RA, Intermaggio MP, et al. Association of p16 expression with prognosis varies across ovarian carcinoma histotypes: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study. J Pathol Clin Res 2018; 4: 250–261.
- 23Yu G, He QY. ReactomePA: an R/Bioconductor package for reactome pathway analysis and visualization. Mol Biosyst 2016; 12: 477–479.
- 24González-Pérez A, López-Bigas N. Improving the assessment of the outcome of nonsynonymous SNVs with a consensus deleteriousness score, Condel. Am J Hum Genet 2011; 88: 440–449.
- 25Adzhubei I, Jordan DM, Sunyaev SR. Predicting functional effect of human missense mutations using PolyPhen-2. Curr Protoc Hum Genet 2013; Chapter 7: Unit7.20.
- 26Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc 2009; 4: 1073–1081.
- 27Kircher M, Witten DM, Jain P, et al. A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants. Nat Genet 2014; 46: 310–315.
- 28Ioannidis NM, Rothstein JH, Pejaver V, et al. REVEL: an ensemble method for predicting the pathogenicity of rare missense variants. Am J Hum Genet 2016; 99: 877–885.
- 29Ahmed AA, Etemadmoghadam D, Temple J, et al. Driver mutations in TP53 are ubiquitous in high grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. J Pathol 2010; 221: 49–56.
- 30Chakravarty D, Gao J, Phillips SM, et al. OncoKB: A Precis Oncology Knowledge Base. JCO Precis Oncol 2017; 1: PO.17.00011.
- 31Farley J, Brady WE, Vathipadiekal V, et al. Selumetinib in women with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum: an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: 134–140.
- 32Moujaber T, Etemadmoghadam D, Kennedy CJ, et al. BRAF mutations in low-grade serous ovarian cancer and response to BRAF inhibition. JCO Precis Oncol 2018; 2: 1–14.
- 33Afghani N, Mehta T, Wang J, et al. Microtubule actin cross-linking factor 1, a novel target in glioblastoma. Int J Oncol 2017; 50: 310–316.
- 34Jain P, Silva A, Han HJ, et al. Overcoming resistance to single-agent therapy for oncogenic BRAF gene fusions via combinatorial targeting of MAPK and PI3K/mTOR signaling pathways. Oncotarget 2017; 8: 84697–84713.
- 35Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U, et al. The cBio Cancer Genomics Portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov 2012; 2: 401–404.
- 36Gao J, Aksoy BA, Dogrusoz U, et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal 2013; 6: pl1.
- 37Steger DJ, Lefterova MI, Ying L, et al. DOT1L/KMT4 recruitment and H3K79 methylation are ubiquitously coupled with gene transcription in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28: 2825–2839.
- 38Berns K, Caumanns JJ, Hijmans EM, et al. ARID1A mutation sensitizes most ovarian clear cell carcinomas to BET inhibitors. Oncogene 2018; 37: 4611–4625.
- 39Elvin JA, Gay LM, Ort R, et al. Clinical benefit in response to palbociclib treatment in refractory uterine leiomyosarcomas with a common CDKN2A alteration. Oncologist 2017; 22: 416–421.
- 40Pal SK, Ali SM, Ross J, et al. Exceptional response to palbociclib in metastatic collecting duct carcinoma bearing a CDKN2A homozygous deletion. JCO Precis Oncol 2017; 1: 1–5.
- 41Tang B, Sheng X, Kong Y, et al. Palbociclib for treatment of metastatic melanoma with copy number variations of CDK4 pathway: case report. Chin Clin Oncol 2018; 7: 62.
- 42Kohli J, Campisi J, Demaria M. A novel suicide gene therapy for the treatment of p16Ink4a-overexpressing tumors. Oncotarget 2018; 9: 7274–7281.
- 43Fernandez ML, Dawson A, Hoenisch J, et al. Markers of MEK inhibitor resistance in low-grade serous ovarian cancer: EGFR is a potential therapeutic target. Cancer Cell Int 2019; 19: 10.
- 44Murtaza M, Jolly LA, Gecz J, et al. La FAM fatale: USP9X in development and disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 2015; 72: 2075–2089.
- 45Berletch JB, Ma W, Yang F, et al. Escape from X inactivation varies in mouse tissues. PLoS Genet 2015; 11: e1005079.
- 46 ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 2012; 489: 57–74.
- 47Murakami R, Matsumura N, Brown JB, et al. Exome sequencing landscape analysis in ovarian clear cell carcinoma shed light on key chromosomal regions and mutation gene networks. Am J Pathol 2017; 187: 2246–2258.
- 48Cheasley D, Wakefield MJ, Ryland GL, et al. The molecular origin and taxonomy of mucinous ovarian carcinoma. Nat Commun 2019; 10: 3935.
- 49Morgan RD, Clamp AR, Evans DGR, et al. PARP inhibitors in platinum-sensitive high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2018; 81: 647–658.
- 50Gershenson DM, Bodurka DC, Coleman RL, et al. Hormonal maintenance therapy for women with low-grade serous cancer of the ovary or peritoneum. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35: 1103–1111.
- 51Tang M, O'Connell RL, Amant F, et al. PARAGON: a Phase II study of anastrozole in patients with estrogen receptor-positive recurrent/metastatic low-grade ovarian cancers and serous borderline ovarian tumors. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 154: 531–538.
- 52Hou JY, Rodriguez-Gabin A, Samaraweera L, et al. Exploiting MEK inhibitor-mediated activation of ERα for therapeutic intervention in ER-positive ovarian carcinoma. PLoS One 2013; 8: e54103.
- 53Cheasley D, Li N, Rowley SM, et al. Molecular comparison of interval and screen-detected breast cancers. J Pathol 2019; 248: 243–252.
- 54Köbel M, Rahimi K, Rambau PF, et al. An immunohistochemical algorithm for ovarian carcinoma typing. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2016; 35: 430–441.
- 55Ayabe A, Miyazaki K, Shimizu D, et al. The LAST guidelines in clinical practice: implementing recommendations for p16 use. Am J Clin Pathol 2015; 144: 844–849.
- 56Marquard AM, Eklund AC, Joshi T, et al. Pan-cancer analysis of genomic scar signatures associated with homologous recombination deficiency suggests novel indications for existing cancer drugs. Biomark Res 2015; 3: 9.
- 57Birkbak NJ, Wang ZC, Kim JY, et al. Telomeric allelic imbalance indicates defective DNA repair and sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. Cancer Discov 2012; 2: 366–375.
- 58Popova T, Manie E, Rieunier G, et al. Ploidy and large-scale genomic instability consistently identify basal-like breast carcinomas with BRCA1/2 inactivation. Cancer Res 2012; 72: 5454–5462.
- 59Abkevich V, Timms KM, Hennessy BT, et al. Patterns of genomic loss of heterozygosity predict homologous recombination repair defects in epithelial ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 2012; 107: 1776–1782.
- 60Burrell RA, McClelland SE, Endesfelder D, et al. Replication stress links structural and numerical cancer chromosomal instability. Nature 2013; 494: 492–496.
- 61Riester M, Singh AP, Brannon AR, et al. PureCN: copy number calling and SNV classification using targeted short read sequencing. Source Code Biol Med 2016; 11: 13.
- 62Thompson ER, Rowley SM, Li N, et al. Panel testing for familial breast cancer: calibrating the tension between research and clinical care. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34: 1455–1459.
- 63Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res 2002; 12: 996–1006.
References 53–63 are cited only in the supplementary material.