Integrated longitudinal circulating tumor DNA profiling predicts immunotherapy response of metastatic urothelial carcinoma in the POLARIS-03 trial
Jingyu Zang
State Key Laboratory of Systems Medicine for Cancer, Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China
Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Ruiyun Zhang
Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Correspondence to: R Zhang or H Chen, Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 160 Pujian Rd, Pudong New District, Shanghai 200127, PR China. E-mail: [email protected] (R Zhang) or [email protected] (H Chen); G Zhuang, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 800 Dongchuan Rd, Minhang District, Shanghai 20024, PR China.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorDi Jin
Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Search for more papers by this authorFeng Xie
Huidu Shanghai Medical Sciences Ltd, Shanghai, PR China
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Search for more papers by this authorAkezhouli Shahatiaili
Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China
Search for more papers by this authorGuangyu Wu
Department of Imaging, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China
Search for more papers by this authorYue Zhang
Huidu Shanghai Medical Sciences Ltd, Shanghai, PR China
Search for more papers by this authorShidong Jia
Huidu Shanghai Medical Sciences Ltd, Shanghai, PR China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Haige Chen
Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China
Correspondence to: R Zhang or H Chen, Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 160 Pujian Rd, Pudong New District, Shanghai 200127, PR China. E-mail: [email protected] (R Zhang) or [email protected] (H Chen); G Zhuang, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 800 Dongchuan Rd, Minhang District, Shanghai 20024, PR China.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Guanglei Zhuang
Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China
Correspondence to: R Zhang or H Chen, Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 160 Pujian Rd, Pudong New District, Shanghai 200127, PR China. E-mail: [email protected] (R Zhang) or [email protected] (H Chen); G Zhuang, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 800 Dongchuan Rd, Minhang District, Shanghai 20024, PR China.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorJingyu Zang
State Key Laboratory of Systems Medicine for Cancer, Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China
Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Ruiyun Zhang
Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Correspondence to: R Zhang or H Chen, Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 160 Pujian Rd, Pudong New District, Shanghai 200127, PR China. E-mail: [email protected] (R Zhang) or [email protected] (H Chen); G Zhuang, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 800 Dongchuan Rd, Minhang District, Shanghai 20024, PR China.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorDi Jin
Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Search for more papers by this authorFeng Xie
Huidu Shanghai Medical Sciences Ltd, Shanghai, PR China
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Search for more papers by this authorAkezhouli Shahatiaili
Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China
Search for more papers by this authorGuangyu Wu
Department of Imaging, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China
Search for more papers by this authorYue Zhang
Huidu Shanghai Medical Sciences Ltd, Shanghai, PR China
Search for more papers by this authorShidong Jia
Huidu Shanghai Medical Sciences Ltd, Shanghai, PR China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Haige Chen
Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China
Correspondence to: R Zhang or H Chen, Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 160 Pujian Rd, Pudong New District, Shanghai 200127, PR China. E-mail: [email protected] (R Zhang) or [email protected] (H Chen); G Zhuang, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 800 Dongchuan Rd, Minhang District, Shanghai 20024, PR China.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Guanglei Zhuang
Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China
Correspondence to: R Zhang or H Chen, Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 160 Pujian Rd, Pudong New District, Shanghai 200127, PR China. E-mail: [email protected] (R Zhang) or [email protected] (H Chen); G Zhuang, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 800 Dongchuan Rd, Minhang District, Shanghai 20024, PR China.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorConflict of interest statement: FX is an employee of Huidu Shanghai Medical Sciences Ltd; YZ is an employee of Huidu Shanghai Medical Sciences Ltd; ZZ is an employee and stock owner of Predicine; PD is an employee and stock owner of Predicine; SJ is an employee of Huidu Shanghai Medical Sciences Ltd and stock owner of Predicine and Huidu Shanghai Medical Sciences Ltd; Other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Abstract
Non-invasive biomarkers for immunotherapy response remain a compelling unmet medical need. POLARIS-03 is a multicenter phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of toripalimab (anti-programmed cell death 1) in refractory metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). We assessed the predictive utility of longitudinal circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis from a single-institution biomarker cohort. Twenty-seven mUC patients receiving toripalimab (3 mg/kg Q2W) at Ren Ji Hospital were enrolled. Serial plasma specimens were obtained at baseline and then every two cycles during treatment. The 600-gene panel (PredicineATLAS™) liquid biopsy assay was applied to probe somatic variants and cancer cell fraction (CCF). Low-pass whole genome sequencing was used to determine the copy number abnormality (CNA) score. Across the entire cohort, we observed different degrees of concordance between somatic aberrations detected by ctDNA and those inferred by matched tumor samples. Although the baseline CCF or CNA had limited predictive value, early ctDNA response at week 8 was associated with toripalimab efficacy and prolonged patient survival. Integrating CCF and CNA decrease achieved a superior accuracy of 90.5% in classifying responders and non-responders and predicted long-term benefit from toripalimab. Dynamic changes in the CCF and CNA in blood exquisitely reflected radiographic assessment of malignant lesions, including those with FGFR3–TACC3 gene fusion or microsatellite instability. This study demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of integrated longitudinal ctDNA profiling as a potential biomarker in mUC patients undergoing immunotherapy and supports further clinical evaluation of minimally invasive liquid biopsy assays for treatment stratification and therapy monitoring. © 2023 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Open Research
Data availability statement
The analyzed sequencing data generated in this study are available within the supplementary material. The raw data of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
path6166-sup-0001-FiguresS1-S5.docxWord 2007 document , 2.2 MB | Figure S1. The detection rate of PredicineATLAS assay across 30 cfDNA reference standard materials (Seraseq® ctDNA Complete™ Mutation Mix) and 21 normal blood samples from healthy donors Figure S2. Venn diagram (upper) displays the origin (tDNA or ctDNA) of detected variants in 26 patients with paired tumor tissues and plasma samples. Spider plots (lower) illustrate the dynamic changes in VAF of each mutation in plasma samples from the same 26 patients over time Figure S3. (A) Somatic alterations detected in six patients with paired primary and metastatic tumor tissues. (B) Venn diagram for the origin (tDNA-pri or tDNA-met) of 162 detected variants in six patients with paired primary and metastatic tumor tissues. (C) Correlation of mutation frequencies (left panel, top mutated genes in Figure 3B) and TMB (right panel) between ctDNA-pre and tDNA-pri or tDNA-met samples. (D) Venn diagram displaying the origin (tDNA-pri or tDNA-met) of variants detected in ctDNA-pre (left panel) and ctDNA-post (right panel) samples from 27 patients Figure S4. (A) Copy number gain (red) and loss (blue) of tDNA-pri, tDNA-met, ctDNA-pre, and ctDNA-post samples, as identified by GISTIC2.0. (B) Box plot comparing CNA in tDNA-pri versus ctDNA-pre samples. (C) Box plot comparing CNA in ctDNA-pre versus ctDNA-post samples. (D) Box plot comparing CNA in tDNA-pri versus tDNA-met samples Figure S5. (A) Box plots comparing CCF (left panel) and CNA (right panel) of ctDNA-pre samples between responders and non-responders. (B) Kaplan–Meier analysis of PFS according to baseline CCF (left panel) or CNA (right panel) level. (C) Kaplan–Meier analysis of OS according to baseline CCF (left panel) or CNA (right panel) level |
path6166-sup-0002-Tables S1-S8.xlsxExcel 2007 spreadsheet , 384.1 KB | Table S1. Gene list of PredicineATLAS panel Table S2. Deep targeted sequencing QC Table S3. SNVs and InDels detected in our study Table S4. SVs detected in our study Table S5. LP-WGS QC Table S6. Toripalimab efficacy for 151 patients in POLARIS-03 trial and 27 patients in the biomarker cohort Table S7. Clinicopathological characteristics of 27 patients in our study Table S8. Mutational measurements and corresponding clinical response of each sample in our study |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- 1 National Cancer Institute. Cancer Stat Facts: Bladder Cancer 2021. [Accessed 27 September 2021]. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/urinb.html
- 2Lenis AT, Lec PM, Chamie K. Bladder cancer: a review. JAMA 2020; 324: 1980–1991.
- 3Zang JY, Ye KY, Fei Y, et al. Immunotherapy in the treatment of urothelial bladder cancer: insights from single-cell analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11: 696716.
- 4Bellmunt J, Powles T, Vogelzang NJ. A review on the evolution of PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy for bladder cancer: the future is now. Cancer Treat Rev 2017; 54: 58–67.
- 5Patel MR, Ellerton J, Infante JR, et al. Avelumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum failure (JAVELIN solid tumor): pooled results from two expansion cohorts of an open-label, phase 1 trial. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19: 51–64.
- 6Sharma P, Retz M, Siefker-Radtke A, et al. Nivolumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum therapy (CheckMate 275): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18: 312–322.
- 7Hofman P, Heeke S, Alix-Panabières C, et al. Liquid biopsy in the era of immuno-oncology: is it ready for prime-time use for cancer patients? Ann Oncol 2019; 30: 1448–1459.
- 8McGrail DJ, Pilié PG, Rashid NU, et al. High tumor mutation burden fails to predict immune checkpoint blockade response across all cancer types. Ann Oncol 2021; 32: 661–672.
- 9Siravegna G, Marsoni S, Siena S, et al. Integrating liquid biopsies into the management of cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2017; 14: 531–548.
- 10Kilgour E, Rothwell DG, Brady G, et al. Liquid biopsy-based biomarkers of treatment response and resistance. Cancer Cell 2020; 37: 485–495.
- 11Vandekerkhove G, Lavoie JM, Annala M, et al. Plasma ctDNA is a tumor tissue surrogate and enables clinical-genomic stratification of metastatic bladder cancer. Nat Commun 2021; 12: 184.
- 12Maia MC, Salgia M, Pal SK. Harnessing cell-free DNA: plasma circulating tumour DNA for liquid biopsy in genitourinary cancers. Nat Rev Urol 2020; 17: 271–291.
- 13Lee JH, Menzies AM, Carlino MS, et al. Longitudinal monitoring of ctDNA in patients with melanoma and brain metastases treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26: 4064–4071.
- 14Lee JH, Long GV, Boyd S, et al. Circulating tumour DNA predicts response to anti-PD1 antibodies in metastatic melanoma. Ann Oncol 2017; 28: 1130–1136.
- 15Lee JH, Long GV, Menzies AM, et al. Association between circulating tumor DNA and pseudoprogression in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-programmed cell death 1 antibodies. JAMA Oncol 2018; 4: 717–721.
- 16Forschner A, Battke F, Hadaschik D, et al. Tumor mutation burden and circulating tumor DNA in combined CTLA-4 and PD-1 antibody therapy in metastatic melanoma – results of a prospective biomarker study. J Immunother Cancer 2019; 7: 180.
- 17Nabet BY, Esfahani MS, Moding EJ, et al. Noninvasive early identification of therapeutic benefit from immune checkpoint inhibition. Cell 2020; 183: 363–376.e13.
- 18Goldberg SB, Narayan A, Kole AJ, et al. Early assessment of lung cancer immunotherapy response via circulating tumor DNA. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 24: 1872–1880.
- 19Ricciuti B, Jones G, Severgnini M, et al. Early plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) changes predict response to first-line pembrolizumab-based therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer 2021; 9: e001504.
- 20Thompson JC, Carpenter EL, Silva BA, et al. Serial monitoring of circulating tumor DNA by next-generation gene sequencing as a biomarker of response and survival in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving pembrolizumab-based therapy. JCO Precis Oncol 2021; 5: 510–524.
- 21Leprieur EG, Herbretau G, Dumenil C, et al. Circulating tumor DNA evaluated by next-generation sequencing is predictive of tumor response and prolonged clinical benefit with nivolumab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Onco Targets Ther 2018; 7: e1424675.
- 22Anagnostou V, Forde PM, White JR, et al. Dynamics of tumor and immune responses during immune checkpoint blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res 2019; 79: 1214–1225.
- 23Cabel L, Riva F, Servois V, et al. Circulating tumor DNA changes for early monitoring of anti-PD1 immunotherapy: a proof-of-concept study. Ann Oncol 2017; 28: 1996–2001.
- 24Raja R, Kuziora M, Brohawn PZ, et al. Early reduction in ctDNA predicts survival in patients with lung and bladder cancer treated with durvalumab. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 24: 6212–6222.
- 25Cabel L, Proudhon C, Romano E, et al. Clinical potential of circulating tumour DNA in patients receiving anticancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2018; 15: 639–650.
- 26Powles T, Assaf ZJ, Davarpanah N, et al. ctDNA guiding adjuvant immunotherapy in urothelial carcinoma. Nature 2021; 595: 432–437.
- 27Zhang Q, Luo J, Wu S, et al. Prognostic and predictive impact of circulating tumor DNA in patients with advanced cancers treated with immune checkpoint blockade. Cancer Discov 2020; 10: 1842–1853.
- 28Powles T, Carroll D, Chowdhury S, et al. An adaptive, biomarker-directed platform study of durvalumab in combination with targeted therapies in advanced urothelial cancer. Nat Med 2021; 27: 793–801.
- 29Lau TK, Cheung SW, Lo PSS, et al. Non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal chromosomal abnormalities by low-coverage whole-genome sequencing of maternal plasma DNA: review of 1982 consecutive cases in a single center. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 254–264.
- 30Weiss GJ, Beck J, Braun DP, et al. Tumor cell-free DNA copy number instability predicts therapeutic response to immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 23: 5074–5081.
- 31Chen XJ, Chang CW, Spoerke JM, et al. Low-pass whole-genome sequencing of circulating cell-free DNA demonstrates dynamic changes in genomic copy number in a squamous lung cancer clinical cohort. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25: 2254–2263.
- 32Jensen TJ, Goodman AM, Kato S, et al. Genome-wide sequencing of cell-free DNA identifies copy-number alterations that can be used for monitoring response to immunotherapy in cancer patients. Mol Cancer Ther 2019; 18: 448–458.
- 33Davis AA, Iams WT, Chan D, et al. Early assessment of molecular progression and response by whole-genome circulating tumor DNA in advanced solid tumors. Mol Cancer Ther 2020; 19: 1486–1496.
- 34Sheng X, Chen H, Hu B, et al. Safety, efficacy and biomarker analysis of toripalimab in patients with previously treated advanced urothelial carcinoma: results from a multicenter phase II trial POLARIS-03. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 28: 489–497.
- 35Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009; 45: 228–247.
- 36Seymour L, Bogaerts J, Perrone A, et al. iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18: e143–e152.
- 37Newman AM, Lovejoy AF, Klass DM, et al. Integrated digital error suppression for improved detection of circulating tumor DNA. Nat Biotechnol 2016; 34: 547–555.
- 38Cibulskis K, Lawrence MS, Carter SL, et al. Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples. Nat Biotechnol 2013; 31: 213–219.
- 39Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Benson M, et al. ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44: D862–D868.
- 40Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 2015; 526: 68–74.
- 41Sudmant PH, Rausch T, Gardner EJ, et al. An integrated map of structural variation in 2,504 human genomes. Nature 2015; 526: 75–81.
- 42Lek M, Karczewski KJ, Minikel EV, et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature 2016; 536: 285–291.
- 43Glusman G, Caballero J, Mauldin DE, et al. Kaviar: an accessible system for testing SNV novelty. Bioinformatics 2011; 27: 3216–3217.
- 44Vandekerkhove G, Todenhöfer T, Annala M, et al. Circulating tumor DNA reveals clinically actionable somatic genome of metastatic bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 23: 6487–6497.
- 45Gandara DR, Paul SM, Kowanetz M, et al. Blood-based tumor mutational burden as a predictor of clinical benefit in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with atezolizumab. Nat Med 2018; 24: 1441–1448.
- 46Adalsteinsson VA, Ha G, Freeman SS, et al. Scalable whole-exome sequencing of cell-free DNA reveals high concordance with metastatic tumors. Nat Commun 2017; 8: 1324.
- 47Gu Z, Eils R, Schlesner M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics 2016; 32: 2847–2849.
- 48Mayakonda A, Lin DC, Assenov Y, et al. Maftools: efficient and comprehensive analysis of somatic variants in cancer. Genome Res 2018; 28: 1747–1756.
- 49Strickler JH, Loree JM, Ahronian LG, et al. Genomic landscape of cell-free DNA in patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Discov 2018; 8: 164–173.
- 50Sundahl N, Vandekerkhove G, Decaestecker K, et al. Randomized phase 1 trial of pembrolizumab with sequential versus concomitant stereotactic body radiotherapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol 2019; 75: 707–711.
- 51Knijnenburg TA, Wang LH, Zimmermann MT, et al. Genomic and molecular landscape of DNA damage repair deficiency across the cancer genome atlas. Cell Rep 2018; 23: 239–254.
- 52Lo YMD, Han DSC, Jiang P, et al. Epigenetics, fragmentomics, and topology of cell-free DNA in liquid biopsies. Science 2021; 372: eaaw3616.
- 53Kwan EM, Dai C, Fettke H, et al. Plasma cell-free DNA profiling of PTEN-PI3K-AKT pathway aberrations in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. JCO Precis Oncol 2021; 5: PO.20.00424.
- 54Dong X, Zheng T, Zhang M, et al. Circulating cell-free DNA-based detection of tumor suppressor gene copy number loss and its clinical implication in metastatic prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11: 720727.
- 55Davis AA, Luo J, Zheng T, et al. Genomic complexity predicts resistance to endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibition in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29: 1719–1729.